National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2016-2017
First round
Nigeria, 2016 - 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA-NBS-NDUS-2016-2017-v01
Producer(s)
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Centre for Research and Information on Substance Abuse (CRISA)
Metadata
Created on
Mar 19, 2021
Last modified
Mar 19, 2021
Page views
669217
Downloads
19417
NEEDS FOR ORGANISING DRUGS (F11MostPressingDrug_Policy)
Data file: KEY INFORMANT DATA
Overview
Valid:
1394
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Start:
2305
End:
2404
Width:
100
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
In this section, we would like to discuss firstly the availability of different drug treatment and rehabilitation services in your area. Then I will ask you about the perceived effectiveness of these services and finally on your opinion on the needs for different services for problem drug users in this area.
The next few questions concern how easy you think it is for different sections of the drug using population to obtain help for their drug related problems
The next few questions concern how easy you think it is for different sections of the drug using population to obtain help for their drug related problems
Literal question
Could you describe in your own words what you feel are the most pressing needs for organized activities related to reducing drug use in your area within the following? (Please give comments under which ever you think is relevant for you)
Drug Policy
Drug Policy
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. ADEQUATE RESTRICTION MEASURE FOR DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 1. GOVERNMENT SHOULD CREATE AN AGENCY FOR TRAFFCIKING/ REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 1. REGULATE SALES OF DRUGS 2. STRICT SANCTIONS TO SELLERS 1. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 1. REGULATE TIME OF INTAKE 2. REUGLATE MANFACTURERS AND RETAILERS(PHARMACY) | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| 1.REGULATE SALES OF PRODUCT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| A BARN ON THE USE OF ILLICIT DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| A LOT OF PRIMARY PREVENTION IS NEEDED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ABSTINENCE FROM DRUG | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ADDICTIVE DRUGS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM BEING SOLD OVER THE COUNTER | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ADEQUATE FUNDING OF AGENCIES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ADEQUATE IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING OF DRUG POLICY TO REDUCE DRUG USAGE AMONG MEN AND WOMEN. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ADJUSTMENT OF THE LAW WHEN THE NEED COMES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ADVOCATE FOR HEALTH CARE REFORMS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AGE LIMIT FOR PURCHASE OF ALCOHOLS/RESTRICTION ON DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ALL DRUG SHOULD BE SOLD ON PRESCRIBTION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ALL LAWS CONCERNING DRUGS SHOULD BE PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| ALL STAKEHOLDERS SHOULD BE INVOLVED FOR ENLIGHTENMENT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ALL THE PATENT MEDICINE STORES AND CHEMIST THAT SELL DRUGS SHOULD BE REGULARLY CHECKED AND SUPERVISE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMENDMENT OF DRUG POLICIES | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| AMENDMENT OF LAW | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMENDMENT OF LAW,ARREST MADE HAVE NO STIPULATED PENALTY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMENDMENT OF LAW/ MAKE LAWS TO ARREST THE DRUGS USER NOT THE DEALER ALONE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMENDMENT OF LAWS CONCERNING DRUGS AT LEAST FOUR YEARS BETWEEN | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMENDMENT OF NEW DRUG POLICY AND ALSO THE WEAK LAWS SHOULD BE AMENDED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AMENDMENTS OF LAWS CONCERNING DRUGS AT LEAST EVERY FOUR YEARS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AN EFFECTIVE AND ALL ENCOMPASSING DRUG POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ANCTIONS ON DEFAULTERS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ANTIDRUG POLICY IS KEY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| APPARENTLY DORMANT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| APPLICABLE HERE TO MINORS, WHO THIS POLICY HAS TO PROVIDE EDUCATIONAL AWARENESS PROGRAMMES. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ARREST AND INCARCERATION OF DRUG OFFENDERS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ARREST AND PROSECUTION OF DRUG USERS AND SELLERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ARREST AND PROSECUTION OF DRUG USERS WILL SERVE AS A LESSON TO THE UPCOMING USERS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ARREST DRUG DEALERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ARREST OF PROSECTION POLICY SHOULD BE MADE EFFECTIVE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ARREST PRODUCERS AND THE USERS OF THE DRUG. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION OF DRUG USE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AWARENESS OF THE POLICY AS NOT MANY PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT IT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AWARENESS PROGRAMS SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT TO SCHOOLS, PLACE OF WORSHIP AND HOMES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AWARENESS SHOULD BE MADE IN SCHOOLS ON THE ILLS OF DRUG | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| AWARNESS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAN OF ILLEGAL DRUGS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| BAN OF IMPORTATION OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAN ON DRUG | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAN ON THE SELLING OF HARD DRUGS | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| BAN THE PRODUCTION OF HARD DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAN THE SALES AND PRODUCTION OF ILLICIT DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BAN THE USAGE AND SELLING OF THIS DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BANNING SOME DRUG, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BARN OF ALCOHOL INTAKE AMONG ADOLESCENTS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| BARN ON ILLICIT DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| BARN PRODUCTION AND SALES OF SOME DRUGS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHANGE POLICY OF GRANTING BAIL TO DRUG DEALERS (NO OPTION OF BAIL) | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHANGE POLICY OF GRANTING BAIL TO DRUG DEALERS (NO OPTION OF BAIL). | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHANGE THE LAW OF IMPRISONMENT FOR DRUG USERS, INSTEAD DRUG DEALERS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CLEAR POLICES SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO CURTAIL USE AND ABUSE OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| COLLABORATING WITH THE GOVERNMENT IN FIGHTING DRUG ABUSE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| COME UP WITH POLICY THAT WILL CONTROL DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| COMMUNITY SHOULD DRAFT A MEMO TO STATE AUTHORITY ON THE NEED TO CUT DRUG ACTIVITIES IN THEIR AREA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| COMPULSORY HOSPITALISATION AND REHABILITATION FOR USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONCERNED AUTHORITIES SHOULD REVIEW THE EXISTING DRUG POLICY WITH THE VIEW OF IMPLEMENTING IT FULLY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONCRETE POLICY SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONTENT NOT KNOWN TO PUBLIC. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONTROL SHOULD BE PUT ON DRUG AVAILABILITY. PUBLICITY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONTROL SYSTEM DEEDED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONTROL THE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS TO CHECK AVAILABILITY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONTROLLED ACCESS TO DRUGS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| CONVICTION OF OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CORRECTIVE DRUG POLICY, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| COUNSELLING AND CREATING OF JOB OPPORTUNITY FOR THE MASSES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CREAT AWARENESS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CREATE POLICY TO RELEASE THE INTAKE OF DRUGS, PHARMACIES BE HELD RESPONSIBLE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CREATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND PROPER BOARDER POLICING TO CHECK IMPORTATION OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| CRIMINALIZATIO OF DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| CRIMINALIZATIO OF DRUGS WITH SANCTIONS ON DEFAULTERS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| CRIMINALIZATION AND STRENG OF DRUG POLICIES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| CRIMINALIZE DRUG USE | 28 |
2%
|
|
| DEATH PENALTY FOR DEALERS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DEATH SENTENCE FOR DRUG USERS OR TRAFFICKERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DEATH SENTENCE TO DRUG DEALERS, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DECRIMINALISE SUBSTANCE LIKE CANNABIS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DECRIMINALIZATION OF DRUG USERS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DEFAULTERS SHOULD BE PUNISHED IN OTHER TO SERVE AS LESSION FOR OTHERS. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS RESEARCH | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT DRUG POLICY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DON’T KNOW | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DON’T REALLY HAVE AN IDEA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG CONTROL POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED, THE DRUGS MUST BE REDUCED ON AVAILABILITY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG CRIMINALISATION | 5 |
0.4%
|
|
| DRUG EDUCATION PROGRAMME SHOULD BE PUT INTO THE EDUCATION CURRICULUM. | 5 |
0.4%
|
|
| DRUG HAWKERS SHOULD BE FLUSHED OUT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG LAWS SHOULD BE ENFORCED, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG LAWS SHOULD BE OBSERVED | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| DRUG POLICIES NEED TO BE EXTENDED TO COVER MORE DRUGS AND STRENGHTEN THE EXISTING LAWS ON DRUG USE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICIES SHOULD BE AMENDED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 15 |
1.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND THE POLICE SHOULD BE MADE TO UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS INVOLVED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY IS GOOD | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY NEED NDLEA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY NEEDED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY AND STOP HELPING DRUG DEALERS AND USERS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY ENCOURAGE DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY GOVERNMENT NEED TO STOP IMPORTATION OF BAD DRUGS INTO THE COUNTRY, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY GOVERNMENT TO BRING LAW THAT PERFECT THE COMMUNITY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY GOVERNMENT TO ENACT LAW WHICH ATRACT PENALTY TO DRUG USERS, | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY HAS TO BE MADE TO REACH THE JUVENILE LEVEL THROUGH A LOT EDUCATIONAL SENSITISATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY IMPLEMENTATION | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY IS ESSENTIAL IN REDUCING DRUG USE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY IS INEFFECTIVE NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY MUST BE ENACTED AND FOLLOWED UP WITH ACTION | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY MUST BE FOLLOWED UP WITH ACTION | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY MUST BE STRICTLY ENCOURAGEED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY NEED TO BE STRENGHTEND TO DRUG USER. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY NEEDED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY NEEDED, AND WITH FREQUENT FOLLOW UP | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED ESPECIALLY AS IT REGARDS TO USERS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY PHARMACY SHOULD BE MORE DISCIPLINE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY REVIEW | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD ALWAYS BE IMPLIMENTED AND DRUG ABUSE DISCOURAGE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENACTED | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENCOURAGD, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENFORCE AND DRUG ABUSE SHOULD BR DISCOURAGED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENFORCE TO ENSURE DRUGS ARE NOT ABUSE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENFORCE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE ENFORCED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IINTRODUCED AND DRUG ABUSE SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND DRUG ABUSE TO BE BANNED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND FUNDED, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. | 9 |
0.6%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLIMENTED TO ERADICATE DRUG ABUSE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE INTRODUCED AND DRUG ABUSE BE DISCOURAGED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE MORE STRICT AND RELIABLE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE REVIEWED EVERY TWO YEARS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO PEOPLE. | 5 |
0.4%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE VISITED REGULARLY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD INCLUDE PENALTY FOR DEFAULTERS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY SHOULD INVOLVE TREATMENT OF ADDICTS . | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY STRONG ENOUGH BUT IMPLEMENTATION IS THE PROBLEM | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY THAT WILL REDUCE THE AVAILABILITY OF DRUGS SHOULD BE MADE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY THE COMMUNITY SHOULD LIASE WITH THE GOVERNMENT IN FIGHTING DRUG ABUSE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY WOULD BE HELPFUL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY WOULD BE HELPFUL, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: ALL LAW AGENCIES SHOULD ENSURE THEY DO THEIR WORK IN THE COMMUNITIES I.E PROPER MONITOR | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: ANYBODY INVOLVE SHOULD BE PUNISHED IMMEDIATELY. IT WILL SERVE AS LESSION FOR OTHERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: DRUG SELLERS SHOULD BE CAUTIONED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE POLICIES THAT WILL REDUCED THE DRUG USES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT ALLOW ALL THESE DRUGS IN THE COMMUNITY. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: LAW THAT WILL REDUCE THE RATE OF DRUG ABUSE SHOULD BE MADE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: MORE LOVE SHOULD BE EXPRESSED, MORE RESEARCH IN DRUG USE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: MORE POLICY CONCERNING SALES AND PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: MORE POLICY SHOULD BE MADE IN OTHER TO REDUCE THE RATE OF DRUG USE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: MORE PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO ANY PEOPLE FOUND OF DRUG ABUSE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: REGULATORY BODY FOR DRUG USE PEOPLE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN DRUGS. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: STRICTER POLICY MEASURE, SOCIETAL DISAPPROVAL, HIGH TARRIF ON TOBACCO COMPANIES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: STRONG ADDICT SHOULD BE PROMULGATED AGAINST THE USE OF DRUGS. | 10 |
0.7%
|
|
| DRUG POLICY: THE DRUG POLICY IS FINE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG PRODUCERS SHOULD BE CAUTIONED. DRUG SELLER LIKE PATENT STORES SHOLUD BE CAUTIONED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG REDUCTION POLICIES MUST BE FORMULATED AND IMPLEMENTED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG SUBSTITUTION POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG TREATMENT AGENT SHOULD STOP IMPRISONING THEM, THEY GO THERE AND BECOME MORE HARDERNED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG USE SHOULD BE LEGALIZED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG USERS NEED NOT TO BE TREATED AS DRUG PEDDLERS AND BARONS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG USERS NOT TO BE TREATED AS DRUG BARONS OR TRAFFICERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUG USERS SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUGS MUST BE SOLD UNDER DOCTORS PRESCRIBTION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| DRUGS POLICY IS VERY IMPORTANT IN NIGERIA, BUT SUPPOSED TO BE REVIEWED, MORAL LESSION FROM THE GRASS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EDUCATE PEOPLE GENERALLY ON THE DANGERS OF DRUG USED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| EDUCATED THE DRUG USER ON DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EDUCATING PEOPLE ON DRUG USE AND IT'S EFFECT SHOULD BE PART OF DRUG POLICY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| EDUCATION OF YOUTHS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE DRUG POLICY | 10 |
0.7%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE DRUG POLICY IMPLEMENTATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE DRUG POLICY NEEDED | 14 |
1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE EXACT POLICES. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION NOT TREATING DRUG USERS AS CRIMINALS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DRUG POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVE POLICY TO PREVENT USE O DRUGS OF ABUSE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EFFECTIVENESS OF DRUG POLICES ARE OF IMPORTAND TO SOCIETY | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| EFFECTIVENESS OF DRUG POLICES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EMPHASIS ON DIFFERENT TYPES OF PUNISHMENT TO ANYBODY WHO MISBEHAVE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EMPLOYMENT OF POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| EMPOWER SECURITY TO CRACKDOWN DRUG TRAFFICKERS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| EMPOWERMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENACTING STRONG POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENACTMENT OF DRUG LAWS TO MONITOR ACTIVITIES OF ADDICTS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENACTMENT OF DRUG LAWS TO MONITOR ACTIVITIES OF USERS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| ENCOURAGE CHILDREN TO EMBRACE CULTURAL/RELIGION BACKGROUND | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENCOURAGED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENFORCE AND INCREASE POLICIES AND ENSURE IMPLEMENTATIONS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENFORCE POLICIES ON DRUG ABUSE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENFORCEMENT OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENFORCEMENT OF LAW | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENFORCEMENT OF LAW ON USERS AND DRUG SELLERS SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENFORCEMENT OF LAW SHOULD BE LIBERAL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ENHANCE THE CAPABLITY OF POLICE, NDLEA. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ESTABLISH MORE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT WILL FOCUS ON DRUG ABUSE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ESTABLISH POLICY STANDARDS FOR DRUG USE TO ALL SEGMENTS OF THE POPULATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ESTABLISHING A REHAB CENTRE IN THE COMMUNITY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| EVERY POLICE OFFICER USING DRUGS SHOULD BE RETIRED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FAVOURABLE POLICY, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FORMULATE POLICY WITH THE PEOPLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FREQUENT MEETING WITH NDLEA, POLICE AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS IN SOLVING DRUG RELATED ISSUE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FUNDING AND EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FUNDING OF DRUG RELATED AGENCIES SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| FUNDING OF POLICY IMPLEMENTATION | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| GOOD IMPLEMENTATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOOD POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOV'T SHOULD ENFORCE POLICY,ONLY PRESCRIBED DRUGS TO BE SOLD ON COUNTER. LICENSE SHOULD ONLY BE GIVE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOV'T SHOULD INTERVENE IN SELLING DRUGS IN THE COUNTRY WITHOUT PRESCRIPTIONS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOV'T SHOULD SENSITIZED THE PUBLIC ON DAY USE AND ITS IMPLICATON. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMEN SHOULD ENACT LAWS AGAINST DRUG USERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT CAN CREATE INSTITUTE TO CLAMP DOWN ON DRUG USERS AND ENSURE PRESENCE IN RURAL AREAS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT CAN STOP THE IMPORTATION AND PRODUCTION OF DRUGS IN THE COUNTRY. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT EMPOWERMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT ENFORCE THE POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO IMPLEMENT BETTER DRUG POLICY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT POLICIES SHOULD BE MADE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENFORCE THE POLICY ON DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD AMEND DRUG POLICY IN NIGERIA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD AMEND THE POLICY ON DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD ARREST VTHEM AND TAKE THEM TO REHAB CENTRES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD BAN THE USE OF HARMFUL DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD BAND THE USE AND SELLS OF DRUGS IN THE COUNTRY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD BANNED THE USE OF HARD DRUGS IN THE COUNTRY. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD BRING IN POLICY THAT WILL HELP DISCOURAGE DRUG USER. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD CREATE JOB OPPORTUNITY FOR THE TEAMING YOUTHS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD CREATE MORE POLICY FOR THE DRUG USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENACT LAWS AGAINST SELLING AND USING OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENACT LAWS AGANST DRUG DEALER. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENGAGE THE YOUNTH IN TERM OF UNENPLOYMENT | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENGAGE THE YOUNTH, IN TERM OF EMPLOYMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD FIGURE OUT THEIR PROBLEMS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD FORMULATE POLICIES THAT WILL HELP CURTAIL THIS ISSUE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT AND EXPAND THE SCOPE OF DRUG POLICY TO REACH ALL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPLEMENT POLICY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD IMPROVED DRUG POLICY | 5 |
0.4%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD INTRODUCE SOCIAL INTERVENTION PROGRAMS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD KEEP ARRESTING THE DEALER AND THE USER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE DRUG USER FRIENDLY POLICY TO ENABLE DRUG USERS COME OUT AND SEEK HELP. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE MORE EFFORT ON THE POLICY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE POLICIES THAT WILL REDUCE THE USE OF DRUG IN OUR AREA. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE POLICIES THAT WOULD REGULATE HOW THESE DRUGS ARE SOLD TO THE PUBLIC. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE STRICT POLICY ON DRUG ABUSE. . | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT INPLACE LAW TO SERIOUSLY CHECK ON THE EXCESSES OF DRUGS USAGE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD REGULATE SALES OF DRUGS TO REDUCE ITS AVALIABILITY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD REKINDLE THE LEGISLATIONS ON DRUGS TO ENHANCE EFFECTIVENESS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP DRUG SELLERS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP THE SELLING OF ABUSED DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP THE SELLING OF DRUGS THAT ARE HARMFUL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD TRY TO SORT OUT THEIR PROBLEMS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD UNDERSTAND THEIR PROBLEMS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT SHOULD URGENTLY BUILD REHAB CENTERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT TO MAKE LAWS TO PUT THEM BEHIND BARS TILL THEY STOP TAKING DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENT TO START ARRESTING THE DRUG USERS IN THIS COMMUNITY(PASS IT INTO THE LAW) | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENTS SHOULD AMEND THE POLICY ON DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVERNMENTSHOULD ENGAGE THEM ON SOCIAL INTERVENTION PROGRAMMES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVT SHOULD NOT COMPROMISE IN THEIR DUTIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVT SHOULD PARTNER WITH PRIVATE ORGANISATIONS TO DEVELOP SOUND POLICIES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| GOVT SHOULD PLACE A STRICT BAN ON IMPORTATION, EXPORTATION OR USE OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HARD DRUGS SHOULD NOT BE SOLD OVER THE COUNTER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HARD DRUGS SHOULD NOT BE SOLD WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HARSH PUNISHMENT FOR DRUG DEALERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HAS NEVER BEEN FULLY IMPLEMENTED AND SHOULD ALSO BE INTRODUCED THE YOUNG ADOLESENTS GROUPS TOO. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| HAVING STORNG POLICIES ON SALES, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HEALTH BASED DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE PROMOTED INSTEAD OF IMPRISONMENT, . | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| HELP THEM GET ON THEIR FEET | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| HIGH | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I DON’T KNOW | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I DON’T KNOW ANY POLICY ON DRUG USEAWARENESS IN SCHOOL FOR STUDENTS ON DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I DON’T REALLY KNOW MUCH ON HOW THIS THING WORK. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I DON’T REALLY KNOW MUCH ON HOW THIS THINGS WORK. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I DON’T THINK THERE ARE DRUG POLICIES IN NIGERIA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I DON’T THINK THERE ARE EXISTING POLICIES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I JUST KNOW DRUGS SHOULD BE HARD TO COME BY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK IT IS BETTER WE DECRIMINALIZE DRUG USE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK OUR DRUG POLICY IS GOOD AS IT IS HOWEVER FOR ADDICTS THEY SHOULD BE TREATED AND NOT PUNISHED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK OUR POLICY SHOULD MAKE ALLOWANCE FOR ADULTS TO BE TREATED AND NOT PUNISHED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK THE POLICY AS IT IS ALREADY GOOD JUST NEED EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK THE POLICY SHOULD BE MORE TOWARDS PUBLIC HEALTH. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK THE POLICY SHOULD BE REVIEWED TO ACCOMMODATE TREATMENT OF ADDICT. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK THE POLICY SHOULD BE REVIEWED TO GIVE MORE ATTENTION TO PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH. | 46 |
3.3%
|
|
| I THINK THE POLICY WHATEVER IT IS NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED TO BE MORE EFFECTIVE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH LAWS AND SOME OF THEM ARE VERY GOOD THE PROBLEM IS ENFORCEMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| I THINK WE SHOULD DECRIMINALIZE DRUG USE AS OBVIOUSLY CRIMINALIZING IT HAS NOT HELPED. | 10 |
0.7%
|
|
| I WILL ADVISE IN MY OWN THAT DRUGS THAT ARE HARD DRUGS SHOULD NOT BE SOLD TO ANYONE WITOUT DOCTOR'S | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IF IT WILL BE RESTRUCTURED AND FULLY IMPLEMENTED THEN THE DRUG POLICY WILL BE OF A POSITIVE USE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IF THE POLICY ON GROUND IS NOT EFFECTIVE THERE SHOULD BE MORE POLICY THAT WILL BE EFFECTIVE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IGNORANCE BY PARENTS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPEMENTATION OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENT DRUG LAWS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENT DRUG POLICY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATION AND STRICT ADHERENCE OF DRUG POLICY WILL HELP REDUCE THE INTAKE OF DRUGS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATION OF DRUG LAW | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATION OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES TO STOP USE AND DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATION OF STIFF LAWS BY THE LOCAL GOVT AND COMMUNITY LEADER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATION TO BE MADE EFFECTIVE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTATIONS OF POLICY TO REGULATE CONTROL THE USE OF SUBSTANCE IN OUR COUNTRY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTING DRUG POLICY WILL HELP A LOT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTING EXISTING POLICIES, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLEMENTING EXISTING POLICIES, REORIENTATION IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, ESTABLISH TREATMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLENTATION OF DRUG POLICY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPLENTING IT SHOULD BE THE PRIORITY HERE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPORTATION OF DRUGS SHOULD BE REDUCED SO THAT IT BECOMES EXPENSIVE TO PURCHASE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPOSITION OF BANS OF HARMFUL SUBSTANCES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPRISONMENT FOR OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPRISONMENT FOR OFFENDERS AND RESTRICTION FOR DEALERS BY NAFDAC | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPROVE THE POLICY TO ENCOURAGE INTEGRATION OF EX DRUG USERS INTO THE SOCIETY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPROVED LAW ENFORCEMENT CAPABILITIES TO HANDLE DRUG RELATED ISSUES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPROVED POLICY ENFORCEMENT, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPROVED TO PROVIDE WORK FOR THE YOUTHS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IMPROVEMENT IN CONTROL MEASURES. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IN ORDER TO REDUCE THESE A BAN SHOULD BE PLACED ON SELLING THESE DRUGS OVER THE COUNTER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| INCREAMENT OF POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| INCREASE/INTENSITY IN DRUG POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| INCREASED MAN POWER IN NDLEA, INCREASE FUND, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| INPRISONMENT OF DRUG DEALERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTENSE POLICY ON INTRODUCTION OF AWARENESS IN THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTRODUCTION OF ANTIDRUG ACTIVITIES IN SCHOOL CURRICULUM | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| INTRODUCTION OF POLICIES TO STOP THE USE OF HARMFUL DRUG | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IS NEEDED | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| IT IS GOOD THAT SELLERS AND OTHER ASSOCIATES BE IDENTIFIED AND ACTIONS BE TAKEN AGAINST OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IT SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IT SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IT SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND SHIFTED MORE TO PUBLIC HEALTH. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| IT WILL BE EFFECIENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IT WILL BE VERY EFFICIENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| IT WILL CONTRIBUTE, EMPHASIS ON DIFFERENT TYPES OF PUNISHMENT TO ANYBODY WHO MISBEHAVE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ITS IMPORTANT FOR GOVERNMENT TO ENSURE UP TO DATE DRUG POLICIES, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ITS IMPORTANT TO INTRODUCE DRUGS POLICY THAT WILL BE VERY EFFECTIVE. INLIGHTMENT IS VERY MUCH IMPORT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| JAIL THE DRUG USER AND SELLERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| JOB CREATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAW AGAINST DRUG ABUSE SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAW OF REDUCTION POLICY BY THE GOVERNMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAWS CONCERNING DRUG ABUSE SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAWS SHOULD BE ENACTED TO STOP THE AVAILABILITY OF DRUGS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LAWS SHOULD BE ENACTED TO STOP THE AVAILAILITY OF DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LEGALISATION OF CANNABIS TO DIVERT ATTAINTION FROM COCAINE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LEGALIZATION AND REGULATION OF DRUG DEALING. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LEGALIZED DRUG LIKE CANNABIS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LENGTHY JAIL TERMS FOR TRAFFICKERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LENGTHY PRISON TERMS FOR PERPETRATORS/MONITORING | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LET THERE BE RULES GUIDING DRUG USE AND SALES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LETS US GO FOR DECRIMINALIZATION AND LEGAL REGULATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| LIFE IMPRISONMENT FOR DEALERS | 11 |
0.8%
|
|
| LIFE IMPRISONMENT FOR DRUG DEALERS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| LIFE IMPRISONMENT SHOULD BE PASSED INTO LAW | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAKE IT IN SUCH A WAY THAT WILL MAKE PURCHASE OF PROHIBITED DRUGS MORE DIFFICULT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAKE POLICIES AND ENFORCE SUCH ON DRUG USE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAKE POLICIES AVAILABLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAKE POLICIES AVAILABLE THAT WILL HELP REGULATE DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAKE THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CURRENT POLICY MORE EFFECTIVE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MAKING EXITING DRUGS AGAINST DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MASSIVE SENSITIZATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MEDIA CAMPAIGN AGAINST DRUG USE | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| MEDIA SHOULD BE MORE ACTIVE TO DO THEIR WORK, TO IMPLEMENT THE POLICY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ACTIONS NEEDED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ARREST SHOULD BE DONE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ATTENTION IS REQUIRED FOR YOUTH | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE CONTROL OVER PRESCRIPTION DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE DRUG POLICY IS REQUIRED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE EFFECTIVE LAW SHOULD BE PASS IN THE LAW AS THE EXISTING ONE IS NOT VERY EFFECTIVE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE TOWARDS DRUG POLICY, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ENFORCEMENT OF DRUG LAWS,MORE WORK CAN BE DONE IN THIS REGARD TO HELP VULNERABLE PEOPLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ENFORCEMENT ON THE PROHIBITION OF DRUGS THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ENFORCEMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ENFORCEMENT TO THE DRUGS LAW | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE ENFORNCEMENT AGENCIES NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO GET A BETTER RESULT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE FUNDS AND ENFORCEMENT OF DRUG POLICIES IN THE COUNTRY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE FUNDS AND ENFORCEMENT OF DRUG POLICIES IN THE COUNTRY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT, FUNDING AND CENTERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT TO CRACKDOWN ON DRUG NETWORK | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICIES SHOULD BE ENACTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY IMPLEMENTATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY ON DRUG SHOULD BE ADDED ESPECIALLY ON TREATMENT ON DRUG EDUCATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY ON DRUGS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY SHOULD BE ADOPTED TO IMPROVE ITS EFFECTIVENESS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO PUT FEAR IN THE LIFE OF THE DRUG USER. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY SHOULD BE MADE TO ENABLE THE REDUCTION OF DRUG USE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE POLICY TO CATCH SUPPLIERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE PUNISHMENT TO ANYBODY INVOLVE. | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| MORE SANCTIONS SHOULD MADE ESPECIALLY IN AREAS OF THE PHARMACY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT THIS . | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE STRICT DRUG LAW POLICIES SHOULD BE ENFORCED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE TO BE MADE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE WORK IS NECESSARY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MORE WORK IS REQUIRED, SO AS TO RESCUE OUR UPCOMING YOUTHS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| MUST ENCOURAGE ITS EFFECTIVENESS BY GOVERNMENT. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NAFDAC SHOULD BE EMPOWERED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NDLEA SHOULD WORK HARDER TOWARD ENFORCING DRUG LAWS | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| NECESSARY FOR A DRUG POLICY TO BE ENACTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NECESSARY FOR A DRUG POLICY TO BE ENACTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED FOR DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED FOR DRUG POLICY REVIEW | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| NEED FOR MORE GOVERNMENT POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED FOR MORE WORK LOGISTIC AND MAN POWER MORE FUNDING FROM GOVERNMENT | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED FOR POLICY REVIEW | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED FOR STRONG POLICY AGAINST THE USAGE OF HARD SUBSTANCES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED TO BARN PEOPLE FROM BUYING DRUGS WITHOUT PRESCRIBTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEED TO ENGAGE YOUNG PEOPLE THAT ARE UNEMPLOYED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEEDED UNGENTLY SO THAT ACTIVITY OF DRUG USER CAN BE CHECKOUT. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEEDS EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS PROVISION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEEDS IMPROVEMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEEDS TO BE BETTER IMPLEMENTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEW DRUG POLICIES NEED TO BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEW DRUGS POLICY SHOULD BE INTRODUCED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEW POLICIES ASIDE FROM THE EXISTING ONES SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEW POLICIES ON DRUG MOST BE INTRODUCED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| NEW POLICIES ON DRUGS SHOULD BE ENACTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEW POLICIES SHOULD BE ENACTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| NEW POLICIES SHOULD BE MADE TO GUILD AGAINST DRUG USE AND SELLIG. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NEW POLICY SHOULD BE ENACTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| NEW POLICY SHOULD BE ENACTED TO BRING IN MORE SEVERE PUNISHMENT TO DRUG SELLER/USERS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| NGO AND NDLEA NED MORE SUPPORT FOR EFFECTIVE DELIVERY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NO | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NOT EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| NOT EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTED DRUG USERS NOT TO BE TREATED AS OFFENDERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| OFFEDERS SHOULD BE PROSECUTED ACCORDINGLY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| OFFENDERS SHOULD BE PUNISHED AND MORE POWER SHOULD BE GIVEN TO FIGHTING AGENCIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| OKAY BUT LESS IMPLEMENTATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ON DRUG POLICY THE STATE GOVERNMENT SHOULD WAKE UP | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| ONLY REGISTERED AND LICENSED PEOPLE SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO SELL DRUGS | 7 |
0.5%
|
|
| OPEN POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ORGANISED ACTIVITIES COULD HELP RENDER AWARENESS TO DRUG USERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ORGANISING SEMINARS IN PUBLIC PLACES ON DRUGS AND IT S SIDE EFFECTS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ORGANIZING SEMINARS ON DRUG ISSUE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ORIENTATION IS MUCH NEEDED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| OUR DRUG POLICY IS OKAY IS JUST THE IMPLEMENTATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| PENALITIES ON DEFAULTERS AND BAND ON DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PENALITIES TO OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PEOPLE SHOULD BE EDUCATED ON THE LAW ON DRUG USE AND MISUSE. THE DRUG POLICY IS NOT VERY EFFECTIVE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PEOPLE SHOULD BE MADE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT DRUG POLICY IS ALL ABOUT | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICE TO PURNISH THOSE SELLING THE DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES ARE WEAK AND NOT ALWAYS IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES BE ENFOCED ON DRUG SELLERS AS WELL AS THE USERS/CONSUMERS. | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| POLICIES FOR OFFENDERS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES LACK PROPER INPLEMENTATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE FORMULATED TO CHECK THE SALES OF PROBLEM DRUGS OVER THE COUNTER. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND TAKEN SERIOUS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED ON DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. RESTRICTION ON THE SALES OF IMPLICATED OVER THE COUNTER DRUS | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE MADE ON DRUG USE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE MADE TO REGULATE DRUG USERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE THAT SEES THE EASE OF DRUG USERS TO GET HELP, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE WITHOUT COMPROMISE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD BE WITHOUT FEAR AND FAVOR | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD LOOKING INTO THE ACTIVITIES OF TRAFFICKERS WITH NDLEA. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD LOOKING INTO THE ACTIVITIES OF TRAFFICKERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD TARGET THE DEALERS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES SHOULD TARGET THE DEALERS CANNABIS IMPORTERS AND PLANTERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES TO BARN ADVERTISEMENT OF ILLICIT DRUGS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES TO CHECKMATE THE SALE OF DRUGS BY NON PROFFESSIONALS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICIES TO CURTAIL THE AVAILABILITY OF THE DRUGS, GOVERNMENT SHOULD ARREST THOSE SALING DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY AND PREVENTION PROGRAM WILL HELP REDUCE AND CONTROL DRUG USE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY DELAY NEEDS TO INCORPORATE THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY IMPLEMENTATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IS THE PROBLEM, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY OF DRUGS SHOULD BE REVIEWED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY OF SERIOUS ARREST AND PROSECUTION IS NEEDED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY ON DRUG USE SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY ON DRUGS USE NEEDS TO BE CREATED BY GOVERNMENT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SCHOULD ENSURE THEY REDUCE THE ALCOHOL CONTENT OF SOME DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED TO START ARRESTING DRUG USERS | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD BE MADE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD BE REJIGGED TOWARDS PUBLIC HEALTH WITH PROPER IMPLEMENTATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD ENCOURAGE PRIMARY PREVENTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD INVOLVE TREATMENT AND NOT ONLY IMPRISONMENT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD REDUCE THE DRUG USAGE AMONG YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY SHOULD TARGET AT TRAFFICKERS, DEALERS AND USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY THAT EDUCATES THE PEOPLE ON THE DANGERS OF DRUG USE SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY TO BAN ILLEGAL DRUG DEALERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| POLICY USE ON DRUGS NEEDS TO BE CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PORPER SENSITIIZATION/AWARENESS CAMPAGIN IN WORSHIP CENTERS, BY TRADITIONAL RULERS, MORE JOBS PROVID | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PRESCRIPTION SHOULD BE PLACED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PRESENT ALCOHOL POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PRIMARY PREVENTION: MORE CARE CENTRES SHOULD BE CLOSE TO THEIR HOME | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PRIMARY PREVENTION: MORE CARE CENTRES SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROBLEM DRUG USERS NEED NOT TO BE TREATED AS CRIMINAL OR DRUG BARONS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROBLEM IN IMPLEMENTING POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT POSSESSION DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT PRODUCTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT PRODUCTION OF ILLICIT DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT THE POSSESSION & DISTRIBUTION OF ILLEGAL DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT THE PRODUCTION OF ILLICIT DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBIT THE USE OF ILLICIT DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBITION OF DRUG USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROHIBITS THE POSSESSION OF DRUGS UNDER AGE 15 | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROPER CHECK SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE TO STOP DRUG SALE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROPER CHECK SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE TO STOP DRUG SELLERS AND DRUG PARTRONIZERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROPER IMPLEMENTATION IS REQUIRED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROPER MONITORING AND PROSECUTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROPER MONITORING BY LAW AGENCY, MORE PUNISHMENT TO ANY BODY THAT IS INVOLVED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROPER SURVEILLANCE SHOULD BE SET UP TO CHECKMATE DRUG IMPORTATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROVIDE PROPER MONITORING TO PLACES THAT SELL ALL THESE DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROVISION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| PROVISION OF JOB OPPORTUNITY FOR YOUTHS TO BE ENGAGED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| PUBLIC ENLIGHTMENT ABOUT THE CONSEQUNCES OF THE RISK OF BEING INFECTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PUNISHMENT FOR DRUG USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PUNISHMENT OF DRUG USERS SHOULD BE ABOLISHED THEY ACTUALLY NEED HELP | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE STIFF FOR DEFAULTERS | 8 |
0.6%
|
|
| PUNISHMENT TON DEFAULTERS IN OTHER TO SERVE AS LESSION FOR OTHERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| PURPOSEFUL AND OBJECTIVE POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REAMEND DRUG POLICY | 9 |
0.6%
|
|
| REDUCE PRODUCTION OF ILEGAL DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REFORMATION OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATE PRODUCTION AND SALE OF DRUGS: | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATE PRODUCTION AND SALES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATE THE AVAILABILITY OF DRUGS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATION /ENFORCEMENT OF CONTROLS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATION OF DRUG USE | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| REGULATION OF SELLING OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATION ON HOW TO SALE DRUGS ESPECIALLY TO THE GENERAL PUPIL | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATION/ RULES/ LAWS THAT WOULD RESTRICT SELL OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REGULATIONS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED THROUGH NAFDAC, NDLEA, AND OTHER RELEVANT AGENCIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REHAB IS IMPORTANT | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| REHABILITATION CENTRES SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| REHABILITATION OF MORAL EDUCATION IN SCHOOL. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REQUIRE AGGRESSIVE IMPLEMENTATION, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTORATION OF MORAL EDUCATION IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTRICTION OF BEER PARLORS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTRICTION OF SALES OF CERTAIN PHARMACEUTICALS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| RESTRICTION ON THE SALES OF ILLICIT DRUGS OVER THE COUNTER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTRICTION SHOULD BE PLACED ON SALE OF SOME DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTRICTIONING THE SALES OF DRUG | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTRUCTURE THE NDLEA. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| RESTRUCTURE THE WAY THE POLICIES ARE MADE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REUGULATION OF CONTROL USE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW AND REVIVE SOME POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW AND REVIVE SOME POLICIES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO CUT THE SUPPLY, DESTROY LABS AND PUNISH OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO PUNISH OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO PUNISH OFFENDERS WITH PENALTY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO PUNISHMENT | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO REDUCE DRUG USE PENALTY | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO REDUCE PENALTY | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO REDUCE PUNISHMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO REDUCE PUNISHMENT FOR USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUG POLICY TO SEE DRUG USERS A VICTIMS | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| REVIEW DRUGS PUNISHMENT | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW IT TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEW TO GIVE MORE EMPHASIS TO TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| REVIEWED TO FAVOUR TREATMENT OF DRUG USERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SALES OF DRUG BY PRESCRIPTION, EDUCATING PEOPLE NOT TO BUY WITH OUT SUCH, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANCTIONS ON DEFAULTERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANCTIONS TO DEFAULTING PHARMACIES AND PATENT DRUG STORES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ARE INVOLVE IN THE USE OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SECURITY OFFICERS SHOULD WORK WELL, PHARMACIST AND CHEMISTS SHOP SHOULD BE MONITORED WELL, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SELLERS AND CONSUMERS SHOULD BE PUNISHED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SELLERS SHOULD BE PUNISHED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SELLING OF OVER THE COUNTER DRUGS SHOULD BE BARNED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SENSITIZATION OF USERS ON DRUG POLICY, PROVIDING SERVICE CENTERS FOR THEM. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SENSITIZTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SEVERE PENALTY FOR ANYBODY CAUGHT SELLING DRUGS. THERE SHOULD BE NO BAIL. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SHOLD BE REVIEWED AND IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SHOULD BE DONE BY EXPERTS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SHOULD BE ENACTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SHOULD BE ENCOURAGE | 6 |
0.4%
|
|
| SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND PROPER HANDS AND MAN POWER SHOULD BE BROUGHT IN FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SHOULD BE SEEN AS PATIENTS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SHOULD CARTER FOR BOTH MINORS AND ADULT AND FULLY IMPLEMENTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SKILL ACQUISTION PROGRAM | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SPECIALL DRUG COURTS WITH REHABILITATION CENRES SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SPONSOR PROGRAMME ON SENSITISATION, AWARENESS EDUCATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STIFF PENALITIES FOR DEFUALTERS, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STIFF PENALITIES FOR TRAFFICKERS | 12 |
0.9%
|
|
| STIFF PENALITIES FOR OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STOP ILLEGAL DRUGS PRODUCTION | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STOP POSSESSION OF ILLEGAL DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STOP PRODUCTION OF DRUG THROUGH POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STOP THE PRODUCTION OF HARD DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STREGTHEN THE EXISTING DRUG POLICY AND MAKE IT MORE EFFECTIVE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STREGTHENING OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRENGHTEN THE DRUG POLICY TO HELP ADDICTS AND ALSO TO DISCOURAGE OTHER PEOPLE FROM TAKING TO DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICK REGULATION ON DRUGS SALE: | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICKLY RESTRICT THE SALES OF HARMFUL DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT CONTROL MEASURES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO CURB THE EVER EXPANDING INFLUENCE OF DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT CONTROL POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMETED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT DRUG POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| STRICT LAW POLICY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT LAW SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT LAWS ON DEALERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT LAWS SHOULD BE ENACTED AGAINST DRUG SELLERS AND USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT LAWS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICIES BY THE GOVT. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICIES MUST BE IMPLEMENTED. THEY MUST BE A DOCTOR'S PRESCRIPTION | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| STRICT POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| STRICT POLICY AGAINST DRUG DEALERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICY ON DRUG ABUSE, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICY ON SALE AND DISTRIBUTION EVEN IN RESIDENTIAL AREA, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICY SHOULD BE ENACTED AND PUNISH ONLY DRUG BARONS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT POLICY SHOULD BE MADE FOR DRUG DEALERS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT PUNISHMENT ON OFFENDERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICT SACTION ON SALES AND DISTRIBUTION OF ILICIT DRUGS LIKE TRAMADOL: | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICTER CONTROL MEASURES SHOUD BE IN PLACE FOR THE CHECK ON THE RATE AT WHICH THE DRUGS ARE BEING | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICTER LAWS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICTER LAWS AGAINST DRUG DEALERS SHOULD BE ENACTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICTER POLICIES ON PRODUCTION OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICTER POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRICTLY RESTRICT THE SALES OF ABUSIVE DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRINGENT POLICY SHOULD BE ENFORCED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRONG LAW POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRONG POLICIES AGAINST DRUG USERS | 7 |
0.5%
|
|
| STRONG POLICY SHOULD BE ENACTED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| STRONG POLICY SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE TO DRUG DEALER AND BUYER. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SUCH DRUGS SHOULD BE RESTRICTED SO AS TO REDUCE THE AVAILABILITY FOR USAGE BY THESE SET OF PEOPLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SUCH DRUGS SHOULD BE RESTRICTED SO AS TO REDUCE THE AVAILABILITY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| SUPERVISION OF THOSE LAWS THAT ARE IN PLACE ALREADY, THOSE GOTTEN WITH THE DRUGS SHOULD BE PURNISHED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TGE DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE REVIEWED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE ALREADY EXISTING POLICIES SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO THE LATER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE CONSUMPTION OF HARD DRUGS SHOULD BE DECLARED ILLEGAL BY THE GOVERNMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POICY SHOULD TEND TOWARDS PUBLIC HEALTH. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY AND AGENCY IN OUR COUNTRY SHOULD TRY TO DO SOMETHING FOR THE DRUG USERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY IN NIGERIA AND IN OUR STATE SHOULD TRY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE TO BUILD A REHABILITATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY IN THIS COUNTRY SHOULD WAKE UP AND INTRODUCE A NEW METHOD OF HELPING THE DRUG USER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY IS ALREADY THERE THE ONLY PROBLEM IS IMPLEMENTATION. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE REVIEWED, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY SHOULD BE THAT WHICH CAN REDUCE DRUG ABUSE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG POLICY SHOULD TRY AND INTRODUCE SOMETHING NEW FOR THE DRUG USER E.G VOCATIONAL SKILLS E.T.C | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG SELLERS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM SELLING ANY ABUSIVE DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG SHOULD NOT BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE DRUG USERS ARE TO BE GIVEN ORIENTATION CONCERNING THE USING OF THE DRUG THE EFFECT IN FUTURE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE EXISTING LAW SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED FULLY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD SUPPORT TO IMPLEMENT DRUG TREATMENT POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD AMEND THE DRUG POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD COME OUT WITH A PENALTIES AGAIST DRUG DEALERS IN THE COMMUNITY | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD COME OUT WITH A STIFFER PENLTIES AGANST DRUG HAWKING IN THE SOCIETY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD MAKE SURE THAT POLICIES ARE IMPLEMENTED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT IN PLACE BETTER DRUG POLICES | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE GOVERNMENT TO KEEP PUTTING A LAW INTO PLACE TO ARREST DRUG DEALERS AND USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE IMPLICATIONAND STRUCTURES OF POLICIES ARE WANTING. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE IMPLICATIONS AND STRUCTURES OF POLICIES ARE WANTING | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE LAW SHOULD BE ENFORCED IN TERMS OF PUNITIVE MEASURES ON DRUG USERS. | 49 |
3.5%
|
|
| THE NDLEA SHOULD ALWAYS TRY NOT TO STIGMATISE THE PEOPLE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE NEED FOR STRONG POLICY AGAINST THE USE OF ALL SUBSTANCES. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE ONLY WAY IS THAT POLICE AND OTHER LAW SHOULD BE FRIENDLY TO THEM. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE ONLY WAY IS THAT THE NDLEA SHOULD BE FRIENDLY TO THOSE DRUG USERS BY COUNSELLING THEM. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICE, NDLEA, NAFDAC, ETC SHOULD NOT COMPROMISE IN THEIR DUTIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICIES ARE NOT BEEN APPLIED BECAUSE THE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICIES SHOULD BE WORKED UPON. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY HAVE TO ACCOMODATE PUBLIC HEALTH VIEW. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY HAVE TO BE INCREASED TO REDUCE THE RATE OF DRUG INTAKE. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY HAVE TO BE PRACTISE NOT GIVEN A LAW WITHOUT ABIDING IN IT. | 10 |
0.7%
|
|
| THE POLICY NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED TO ADAPT A MORE PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED TO PROMOTE REHABILITATION AND DRUG EDUCATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY NEEDS TO CHANGE TOWARDS PUBLIC HEALTH AND SOME OF THESE CRIMINALS DRUGS SHOULD BE CHANGED | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY NEEDS TO MAKE PROVISION OR TEATMENT AND DRUG EDUCATION IN THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY NEEDS TO SHIFT FROM JUST LAW ENFORCEMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY SHOULD BE IMPROVED UPON BECAUSE IT IS NOT ACTUALLY WORKING | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY SHOULD BE REAMENDED TO FIT INTO THE GRASSROOT LEVEL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY SHOULD BE REVIEWED TO REDUCE STIGMA ON DRUG ADDICT AND THEIR FAMILY. | 7 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE POLICY SHOULD PROMOTE FOR TREATMENT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THE POLICY SHOULD TAKE MORE OF A PUBLIC HEALTH APPROACH TO BE MORE EFFECTIVE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THER IS NEED FOR THIS IN ALL SCHOOLS AND ON MEDIA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS A NEED FOR DRUG USE SECTION OR PENALTY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS COMPELLING NEED TO FORMULATE AND EXECUTE DRUG TREATMENT POLICIES BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS GREAT NEED TO HAVE PROFESSIONAL IN MY AREA TO TREAT PEOPLE IN NEED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR AMENDMENT OF DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR DRUG POLICY IMPLEMENTATION, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR GOVERNMENT PUT TO IN LAWS TO CHECKMATE DRUG USAGE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR IMPLENTATION OF PLAN OF ACTION TO COMPLIMENT A GOOD OUTCOME. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR POLICY ON DRUG DEALERS.PREVENTION BY PUBLIC ENLIGHTEMENT ON MEDIAS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR STRATEGIES PLAN FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLIMENTATION OF DRUG CONTROL POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR SURVEILLANCE OF USERS, PRODUCERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED FOR THAT. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED TO ENFORCE DRUG MISUSE CONTROL POLICY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NEED TO IMPLEMENT DRUG RELATED SENSITIZATION IN THE COMMUNITY/ EMFORCE DRUG LAW TO CONTROL | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS NO ACTIVE POLICY THAT FIGHTS FOR THE RIGHT OF DRUG USERS, THEY ONLY SEEM TO ALWAYS CONNECT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS URGENT NEED FOR CONCISTENCY IN DRUG POLICY, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS URGENT NEED FOR GOVERNMENT TO ENACT LAW THAT WILL SERIOUSLY CHECK ON THE EXCESSES OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE IS URGENT NEED FOR STRICTER DRUG POLICIES IN THE COUNTRY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE A BAN OF ALL THIS TYPES OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUSTANCES. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE A BAN ON SUPPLY OF ILLEGAL DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE A STRICT ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE TO DRUG USED POLICY. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE COMPLETE BARN ON THIS DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE DECREASE IN THE PRODUCTION OF DRUGS, | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE DECRIMINILIZATION OF DRUG USE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE POLICIES REGULATING SALE OF DRUGS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE POLICY ON THE SALES OF DRUGS ESPECIALLY IN THE PHARMACY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THERE SHOULD BE REGULATION ON DRUG USE. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THEY ARE NATURALLY SCARED OF THEM | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THEY IS NEED FOR DRUG POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THEY POLICIES EXECUTORS ARE USUALLY BIASED WITH ENFORCING LAWS ON DRUG ABUSERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THEY SELLING OF THIS DRUGS SHOULD BE BASICALLY ON DOCTOR'S PRESCRIPTION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THEY SHOULD PROSECUTE THOSE FOUND GUILTY OF CRIMES AND MURDER. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THINK DRUG SHOULD BE REGULATED AND NOT PROHIBITED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| THIS IS NEEDED UNGENTLY FOR THE ACTIVITY OF DRUG USER TO BE CHECKED. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THIS IS THE MOST COMMON | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THIS LAW HAS TO BE IMPLEMENTED, AND SHOULD BE EFFECTIVE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THIS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED NOT ALWAYS ARRESTING THEM. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THIS SHOULD BE INTRODUCED AND IMPLEMENTED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| THOROUGH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| THOSE HAWKING THESE DRUGS SHOULD BE PUNISHED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TO ALWAYS GET THEM ARREST AND JAILED. . | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TO CREATE MORE POLICY FOR DRUG USERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TO IMPLEMENT THE EXISTING DRUG POLICY TO THE LATER | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TO INCREASE THE TREATMENT AS WELL AS REHABILITATION CENTRE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TO REGULATE DRUG USE BY ALLOWING ONLY ONE WHO IS BEING PRESCRIBED BY A DOCTOR. | 52 |
3.7%
|
|
| TO STEP UP ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS AND TRY TO HELP VICTIMS COME OUT OF THE ADDICTION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| TREATMENT AND REHAB IS IMPORTANT | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| TREATMENT CENTRES NEEDED | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| UPDATE AND EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| URGENT NEED | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| URGENT NEED FOR DRUG POLICY | 3 |
0.2%
|
|
| USE POLICE TO STOP THEM FROM ABUSE OF THE PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| USER FRIENDLY POLICY AS COMPULSORY REHAB MORE RESEARCH OF UPDATE OF KNOWLEDGE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| USERS ARE USUALLY SCARED OF THE LAWS IMPLEMENTED | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| VERY IMPORTANT | 5 |
0.4%
|
|
| VERY IMPORTANT IF WELL ORGANISED AND IMPLEMENTED. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| WE ALREADY HAVE POLICIES REGARDING DRUGS, IT IS NOW LEFT FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE SUCH LAWS. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| WE HAVE TO REVIEW THE POLICY TO MAKE LAW IS HARSH FOR DRUG USERS. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WE NEED GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AND NGOS AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT TO STRENGHTEN THE FIGHT AGAINST DRUG | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WE NEED MORE ENFOREMENT ON THE LAWS AND POLICY OF DRUG ABUSE THAT IS CURRENTLY EXISTING | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WE NEED POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WE NEED TO REVIEW THE POLICY IT IS NOT WORKING | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WHEN PROPER SUMMIT ARE HELD IN THE SOCIETIES ABOUT THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF DRUG USE, ITS PREVENTIONS, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY SHOULD BE EXTENDED TO SALE OF DRUGS | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| WITH THE PRESENT POLICY, THE DRUG PROBLEM IS STILL INCREASING. NEED TO REVIEW. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WITH THE PRESENT POLICY, THE DRUG PROBLEM IS STILL INCREASING.THERE IS NEED TO REVIEW. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WITNESS PROTECTION FOR INFORMANTS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| WORKABLE POLICY, | 5 |
0.4%
|
|
| WORKING POLICY IS NECESSARY AND NOT LIP SERVICES, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YERNS FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES | 4 |
0.3%
|
|
| YES FOR DRUG POLICIES | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES GOVERNMENT MUST PUT IN PLACE HELPING HAND FOR THE NDELA | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES IT IS GOOD | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES LET THERE BE POLICY | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES MORE | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES MORE DRUG POLICIES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES STRICT LAWS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES STRICTER LAWS WILL REDUCE THE FLOW OF DRUGS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES THERE SHOULD BE LAWS GUIDING THE SALE OF DRUGS ESPECIALLY PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES THERE SHOULD BE POLICIES. | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES TO CATCH DEALERS | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES VERY IMPORTANT | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| YES, THERE IS NEED FOR NEW DRUG POLICY. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZERO TOLERANCE ON DRUG USE | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZERO TOLERANCE ON DRUG USE AND TRAFFICKING | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZERO TOLERANCE POLICIES BE IMPLEMENTED, | 1 |
0.1%
|
|
| ZERO TOLERANCE TO DRUG USE | 2 |
0.1%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.