Nigeria - Post Measles Campaign Coverage Survey 2018, First round
Reference ID | NGA-NBS-PMCCS-2018-v01 |
Year | 2018 - 2019 |
Country | Nigeria |
Producer(s) | National Bureau of Statistics - Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) |
Sponsor(s) | Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - BMGF - Funding partner The Vaccine Alliance - GAVI - Funding partner Federal Government of Nigeria - FGN - Funding partner |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF Download DDI Download RDF |
Study website |
Created on | Aug 22, 2019 |
Last modified | Aug 22, 2019 |
Page views | 55173 |
Downloads | 7131 |
Data Collection
Data Collection Dates
Start | End | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2018-01-21 | 2019-04-06 | 5 Months |
Data Collection Mode
Face-to-face [f2f]
Interviewers were selected from the states they were deployed in to ensure that the interviewers could speak languages in the state they were assigned to and were conversant with the local culture. Two levels of training were conducted for household listing and mapping. The first stage of training was a training of trainers conducted in Abuja while the second level of training was conducted in every state. The first level training consisted of resource persons and participants from NBS, NPHCDA, WHO, UNICEF and other relevant technical partners while the second level training targeted field workers who were to conduct mapping and listing activities in selected EAs.
A total of 600 personnel comprising of field team supervisors and enumerators were trained of whom 555 were selected to form the data collection teams. Training focused on the survey guidelines, identification of sampled enumeration areas and eligible households, determination of whether an eligible child had been vaccinated, ethics and informed consent, electronic data capture and transmission, and conducting quality control checks. In addition, supervisors were trained on managing survey logistics and on documenting and reporting survey progress. A post-training test was conducted to ensure that only those participants who were conversant with conducting the survey were included into the survey team.
Survey implementation dates
Zone State Training Data collection
NW Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Zamfara 17-19 January 21 January to 2 February
NE Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Taraba, Yobe, (Sokoto) 22-24 January 26 January to 7 February
NC Benue, FCT, Nasarawa, Niger, Plateau 10-12 March 14 to 26 March
SS Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Edo, Rivers 5-7 April 9 to 21 April
SE Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, Imo 11-13 April 15 to 27 April
SW Ekiti, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, Oyo, (Kogi, Kwara) 20-22 April 24 April to 6 May
Survey implementation in Sokoto was conducted with implementation in the North East zone whereas Sokoto geographically belongs to the North West zone while implementation in Kogi and Kwara was conducted with states in South West zone although Kogo and Kwara belong to North Central zone. NW = North West, NE = North East, NC = North Central, SS = South-South, SE = South East, SW = South West
Data collection was conducted by 5 teams in every state with each team comprising of a supervisor and two enumerators. Each team canvased on average 6 enumeration areas in 14 days.
Data Collectors
Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation |
---|---|---|
National Bureau of Statistics | NBS | Federal Government of Nigeria |
There were three levels of quality assurance; Survey teams lead by the supervisors were responsible for quality of data collected. Data were collected on CAPI tablets with inbuilt range checks. Once an enumerator had finished data collection data were transferred to the supervisors CAPI tablet and reviewed the quality and completeness of the data before they were synchronized with the server. NBS state and zonal officers also ensured that the survey was conducted as per the survey guidelines and ensure that logistical support for the teams.
Monitoring by teams comprising of NPHCDA and NBS headquarters and state offices formed the second layer of quality assurance by conducting observations of interviews using checklists.
The third level of monitoring was conducted by monitoring data synchronized to the server and inconsistencies picked up were flagged up to the team supervisor who corrected them before teams left a specific EA.