Nigeria - African Peer Review Mechanism Survey(APRM)-2006, First Round
Reference ID | NGA-NBS-APRM-2006-v1.1 |
Year | 2006 |
Country | Nigeria |
Producer(s) | National Bureau of Statitics(NBS) - Federal Government of Nigeria(FGN) |
Sponsor(s) | National Bureau of Statitics - NBS - Funding New Partnership for African’s Development (NEPAD) - (NEPAD) - Funding National Focal Point Secretariat - APRM - Funding |
Metadata |
![]() |
Created on | Oct 18, 2010 |
Last modified | Dec 02, 2013 |
Page views | 653293 |
Downloads | 24832 |
Degree of transparency
(B3qb)
File: APRM-INDIVIDUAL
File: APRM-INDIVIDUAL
Overview
Type:
Continuous Format: numeric Width: 1 Decimals: 0 Range: 1-5 | Valid cases: 19539 Invalid: 259 Minimum: 1 Maximum: 5 |
Categories
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fully transparent | 827 | ![]() |
2 | Fairly transparent | 2879 | ![]() |
3 | Transparent to a small extent | 2968 | ![]() |
4 | Not transparent at all | 9373 | ![]() |
5 | Don't know | 3492 | ![]() |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Questions and instructions
Pre question
How would you rate the degree of transparency with which the Constituency
Development Fund in your constituency is used?
Development Fund in your constituency is used?