Nigeria - African Peer Review Mechanism Survey(APRM)-2006, First Round
Reference ID | NGA-NBS-APRM-2006-v1.1 |
Year | 2006 |
Country | Nigeria |
Producer(s) | National Bureau of Statitics(NBS) - Federal Government of Nigeria(FGN) |
Sponsor(s) | National Bureau of Statitics - NBS - Funding New Partnership for African’s Development (NEPAD) - (NEPAD) - Funding National Focal Point Secretariat - APRM - Funding |
Metadata |
![]() |
Created on | Oct 18, 2010 |
Last modified | Dec 02, 2013 |
Page views | 652789 |
Downloads | 24832 |
Financial services
(Ob1q16e)
File: APRM-INDIVIDUAL
File: APRM-INDIVIDUAL
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: numeric Width: 1 Decimals: 0 Range: 1-5 | Valid cases: 17776 Invalid: 2022 Minimum: 1 Maximum: 5 |
Categories
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Excellent | 1213 | ![]() |
2 | Good | 4770 | ![]() |
3 | Fair | 3179 | ![]() |
4 | Poor | 3142 | ![]() |
5 | Very poor | 5472 | ![]() |
Sysmiss | 2022 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Rank the benefits of these facilities to you or the community. Recording the code for one of these options against the facilities: - Financial Services
1 = Excellent; 2 = Good; 3 = Fair; 4 = Poor; 5 = Very poor
1 = Excellent; 2 = Good; 3 = Fair; 4 = Poor; 5 = Very poor