Nigeria - Nigeria Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS2)-1999, Second Round
Reference ID | NGA-NBS-MICS2-1999-V1.0 |
Year | 1999 |
Country | Nigeria |
Producer(s) | National Bureau of Statistics [NBS] - Federal Government of Nigeria(FGN) |
Sponsor(s) | National Bureau of Statistics - NBS - Funding United Nations of Children's Fund - UNICEF - Funding |
Metadata | Download DDI Download RDF |
Created on | Oct 18, 2010 |
Last modified | Dec 02, 2013 |
Page views | 276592 |
Downloads | 17035 |
Overview
Identification
NGA-NBS-MICS2-1999-V1.0 |
Version
Version 1.0 (November, 2009) 2009-11-17
Overview
The 1999 Nigeria Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey has as its primary objectives:• To provide up-to-date information for assessing the situation of children and women in Nigeria at the end of the decade and for looking forward to the next decade;
• To furnish data needed for monitoring progress toward goals established at the World Summit for Children and a basis for future action;
• To contribute to the improvement of data and monitoring systems in Nigeria and to strengthen technical expertise in the design, implementation, and analysis of such
systems.
The Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) is conceptualized to monitor the progress of Child Survival, Development, Protection and Participation (CSPPD) Programmes as well as goals set at the World Summit for Children in 1990. Also, at the World Summit for Social Development in 1995, the need was stressed for better social statistics if social development had to move to centre stage for the cause of the children of the world. In 1995, Federal Office of Statistics (FOS) with technical and funding assistance from UNICEF, institutionalized the Multiple Indicator Survey within the National Integrated Survey of Households (NISH) as a process of collection of regular, reliable and timely social statistics. A technical team, the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Intersectoral Task Force (MIT), consisting of all stakeholders was put in place for the 1999 survey to plan, conduct and monitor the survey with FOS providing the leadership. This was an innovation over the previous survey, which greatly enhanced the quality of the work and coverage of programmes.
Nevertheless, this report would have been impossible without the commitments of the following organizations and individuals. Firstly, members of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Inter-sectoral Taskforce (MIT) which facilitated the conduct and over-seeing of the survey. UNICEF Nigeria which gave technical support in the areas of data processing and analysis and report writing through hiring of consultants that worked closely with FOS teams.
This report is another dream to match deeds with words. This report is also unique in the sense that the findings will allow comparison of performance at sub-national (state) and inter national levels. The report will additionally serve as statistical input into future editions of Progress of Nigerian Children Report and UNICEF's State of the World's Children. It is hoped that it will be widely used by various levels of government, Federal and State for programmes and projects monitoring and evaluation on social development and reengineering for the development of the cause of Nigerian Children. It is also an excellent report for top policy formulators and programme managers in the key social sectors.
Sample survey data [ssd]
Household level
Scope
The household questionnaire consists of :Sex
Age
Relationship to headof household
School attendance
Marital status
Literacy and
Occupation.
The household/women’s questionnaire administered in each household and for women aged 15-49.
• Water and sanitation
• Salt iodisation
• Children education
• Fertlity and Child Mortality
• Tetanus Toxoid
• Maternal Mortality
• Care of Acute Respiratory Illness
• Prenatal/Childbirth/Obstetrics, and
• Family Planning
The children’s questionnaire
• Diarrhoea
• Vitamin A
• Malaria
• Breastfeeding
• Immunization
• Child’s Rights, and,
• Anthropometry
Topic | Vocabulary | URI |
---|---|---|
consumption/consumer behaviour [1.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
economic conditions and indicators [1.2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
income, property and investment/saving [1.5] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
rural economics [1.6] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
employment [3.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
basic skills education [6.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
compulsory and pre-school education [6.2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
post-compulsory education [6.5] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
general health [8.4] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
health care and medical treatment [8.5] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
specific diseases and medical conditions [8.9] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
housing [10.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
children [12.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
elderly [12.2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
family life and marriage [12.5] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
gender and gender roles [12.6] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
community, urban and rural life [13.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
social behaviour and attitudes [13.6] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
social conditions and indicators [13.8] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
fertility [14.2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
morbidity and mortality [14.4] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
Coverage
Nigeria is Africa's most populous nation with an estimated 1999 population of 124 million. The country is located in West Africa, bordered on the west by the Republic of Benin, on the north by the Republic of Niger and on the East by the Republic of Cameroun. The country occupies a land area of 923, 768 square kilometres and the vegetation ranges from mangrove forest on the coast to desert in the far north.Administratively, Nigeria consists of 36 states and a Federal Capital territory. These are further divided into 774 local government areas (LGA). For most of her history since independence in 1960, Nigeria has been under military rule. Nigeria returned to democratic rule in May 1999 under a presidential system of government with three tiers of government: federal, state and local. The federal government comprises an executive arm (led by the President), a bicameral legislative arm (Senate and House of Representatives) and a judiciary. Each state has its own governor and house of assembly while each local government has a chairman and council.
The country has abundant natural resources. Major agricultural products include cocoa, rubber, groundnuts, palm oil, cotton, cassava, yam, corn, millet and rice. Mineral resources include petroleum, coal, tin, columbite and gold. However, petroleum has been the mainstay of foreign exchange earnings for Nigeria in the last three decades. Indeed, Nigeria is the sixth largest producer of crude oil in the world and earns several billion US dollars annually from sales of crude oil alone. However, this has not translated to a healthy national economy due to decades of mismanagement and corruption under dictatorial government by successive military regimes. Thus, at the end of the decade (1999), GDP was only US $310. Nigeria's external debt stood at about $32 billion and it was estimated that the government spends about 40% of its earnings servicing foreign debts. The economic hardship during the 1990's meant that social sector spending was far less than required. The health and education sectors, in particular, were deprived of much needed support and funding. It is only with the advent of democratic governance at the end of the decade that the social sector started receiving increased attention.
Nigeria has one of the most ethnically-diverse populations in the world, with more than 380 distinct ethnic groups. The major ethnic groups include (in alphabetical order) the Edo, Efik, Fulani, Hausa, Igbo, Ijaw, Kanuri, Tiv, Urhobo and Yoruba. Population growth has been quite rapid, from 55.7 million in the 1963 national census to 88.5 million in the 1991 census. For much of this period, total fertility rate was over 6 per woman. The population is quite young with 47 percent being under 18 years of age. Children under the age of five years comprise about 20 percent of the population and women of child bearing age another 20 percent of the population.
Under-five mortality has remained over 100 per thousand over the 1990's, being 192 per thousand in 1990 (NDHS 1990) and 147 per thousand in 1995 (MICS 1995). Maternal mortality ratio was estimated to be 800 per thousand in 1995 (The Progress of Nations 1995). Over one-third (36 percent) of under-five children were underweight in 1990. Thus, social indicators show that Nigeria is a country with low GDP, high external debt burden, high child and maternal mortality and high fertility.
2.1 Sample Design
2.1.1 Introduction of NISH Design 1993/99
The Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 1999 was run as a module of the National Integrated Survey of Households (NISH) design. NISH is the Nigerian version of the United Nations National Household Survey Capability Programme and is a multi-subject household based survey system. It is an ongoing programme of household based surveys enquiring into various aspects of households, including housing, health, education and employment. The programme started in 1981 after a pilot study in 1980. The design utilizes a probability sample drawn using a random sampling method at the national and sub-national levels.
The main features of the NISH design are:
Multi-Phase Sampling: In each state 800 EAs were selected with equal probability as first phase samples. A second phase sample of 200 EAs was selected with probability proportional to size.
Multi-Stage Sampling Design: A two-stage design was used. Enumeration Areas were used as the first stage sampling units and Housing Units (HUs) as the second stage sampling units.
Replicated Rotatable Design: Two hundred EAs were selected in each state in 10 independent replicates of 20 EAs per replicate. A rotation was imposed which ensured 6 replicates to be studied each survey year but in subsequent year a replicate is dropped for a new one, that is, a rotation of 1/6 was applied. This means in a survey year, 120 EAs will be covered in each state. In the Federal Capital Territory (Abuja), 60 EAs are covered.
Master Sample: The EAs and HUs selected constitute the Master Sample and subsets were taken for various surveys depending on the nature of the survey and the sample size desired. In any one-year, the 120 EAs are randomly allocated to the 12 months of the year for the survey. The General Household Survey (GHS) is the core module of NISH. Thus, every month 10 EAs are covered for the GHS. For other supplemental modules of NISH, subsets of the master sample are used. The MICS 1999 was run as a module of NISH.
2.1.2 Sample Size
The global MICS design anticipated a sample of 300-500 households per district (domain). This was based on the assumption of a cluster design with design effect of about 2, an average household size of 6, children below the age of 5 years constituting 15 percent of the population and a diarrhoea prevalence of 25 percent. Such a sample would give estimates with an error margin of about 0.1 at the district level. Such a sample would usually come from about 10 clusters of 40 to 50 households per cluster.
In Nigeria, the parameters are similar to the scenario described above. Average household size varied from 3.0 to 5.6 among the states, with a national average of about 5.5. Similarly, children below 5 years constituted between 15-16 percent of total population. Diarrhoea prevalence had been estimated at about 15 percent. These figures have led to sample sizes of between 450 and 660 for each state.
It was decided that a uniform sample of 600 households per state be chosen for the survey. Although non-response, estimated at about 5 percent from previous surveys reduced the sample further, most states had 550 or more households. The MICS sample was drawn from the National Master Sample for the 1998/99 NISH programme implemented by the Federal Office of Statistics (FOS).
The sample was drawn from 30 EAs in each state with a sub-sample of 20 households selected per EA. The design was more efficient than the global MICS design which anticipated a cluster sub-sample size of 40-50 households per cluster. Usually, when the sub-sample size was reduced by half and the number of clusters doubled, a reduction of at least 20 percent in the design effect was achieved. This was derived from DEFF = 1 + (m-1) rho where m is sub-sample size and rho is intra-class correlation. Therefore, the design effect for the Nigerian MICS was about 1.6 instead of 2. This means that for the same size of 600 households, the error margin was reduced by about 10 percent, but where the sample was less than 600 the expected error margin would be achieved.
It should be noted that sampling was based on the former 30 states plus a Federal Capital Territory administrative structure [there are now 36 states and a Federal Capital Territory].
2.1.3 Selection of Households
The global design anticipated either the segmenting of clusters into small areas of approximate 40-45 households and randomly selecting one so that all households within such area was covered or using the random walk procedure in the cluster to select the 40-45 households. Neither of the two procedures was employed. For the segmentation method, it was not difficult to see that the clustering effect could be increased, since, in general, the smaller the cluster the greater the design effect. With such a system, DEFF would be higher than 2, even if minimally. The random walk method, on the other hand, could be affected by enumerator bias, which would be difficult to control and not easily measurable.
For NISH surveys, the listing of all housing units in the selected EAs was first carried out to provide a frame for the sub-sampling. Systematic random sampling was thereafter used to select the sample of housing units. The GHS used a sub-sample of 10 housing units but since the MICS required 20 households, another supplementary sample of 10 housing units was selected and added to the GHS sample. All households in the sample housing units were interviewed, as previous surveys have shown that a housing unit generally contained one household.
Producers and Sponsors
Name | Affiliation |
---|---|
National Bureau of Statistics [NBS] | Federal Government of Nigeria(FGN) |
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
United Nations of Children's Fund | UNICEF | Funding & Technical assistance in Stakeholders meetings, monitoring |
Name | Abbreviation | Role |
---|---|---|
National Bureau of Statistics | NBS | Funding |
United Nations of Children's Fund | UNICEF | Funding |
Name | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Inter-sectoral Taskforce | MIT | Facilitated the conduct and overseeing overseeing of the survey. |
Metadata Production
Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|---|
National Bureau of Statistics | NBS | Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) | Metadata Producer |
DDI-NGA-NBS-MICS2-1999-V1.0