General Household Survey-Panel Wave 3 (Post Planting) 2015-2016
Third round
Nigeria, 2015
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA-NBS-NGHPS-2016-v1.0
Producer(s)
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)
Metadata
Created on
Dec 11, 2016
Last modified
Dec 11, 2016
Page views
147610
Downloads
124851
- Data files
-
Section 1_
Roster - Section 3_Labor
-
Section
4A_Savings and
Insurance -
Section 4B_ ICT
- Mobile Phone
Banking -
Section
4C_Credit -
Section
4C2_Credit -
Section
4C2_Credit -
Section 5_
Household
Assets -
Section
7A_Meals Away
from Home -
Section 7B_Food
Expenditure -
Section 8A_
Non-Food
Expenditure -
Section 8B_
Non-Food
Expenditure -
Section
8C_Non-Food
Expenditure -
Section 9_Food
Security -
Section
9B_Subjective
Wellbeing -
Section
11_Housing -
Section A-1_
Household
Identification -
Section 11A_
Plot Roster -
Section 11A1_
Plot Roster -
Section 11B1_
Land Invetory -
Section 11C1_
Labor -
Section
11E_Seed
Acquisition -
Section 11F_
Planted Field
and Tree Crops -
Section
11I_Animal
Holdings -
Section 11L1_
Extension
Services 1 -
Section 11L2_
Extension
Services 2 -
Section 11J_
Animal Costs -
Section 11K_
Agricultural
by-Product -
Section 12_
Network Roster -
Section A-1_
Household
Identification -
Community
_Identification -
Section 1_
Respondent
Characteristics -
Section 2A_Food
Prices - 1st
Location -
Section 2B_
Food Prices -
2nd Location -
Section 3A_
Labor -
Section 3B_
Labor -
Section 4A_
Land Prices and
Credit -
Section 4B_
Land prices and
credit
How many days had to: limit variety of foods eaten? (S9q1b)
Data file: Section 9_Food Security
Overview
Valid:
4587
Invalid:
4
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
20
End:
20
Width:
1
Range:
0 - 7
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
Limit the variety of foods eaten?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2385 |
52%
|
|
| 1 | 572 |
12.5%
|
|
| 2 | 878 |
19.1%
|
|
| 3 | 405 |
8.8%
|
|
| 4 | 149 |
3.2%
|
|
| 5 | 72 |
1.6%
|
|
| 6 | 24 |
0.5%
|
|
| 7 | 102 |
2.2%
|
|
| Sysmiss | 4 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.